CF1836A.Destroyer
普及/提高-
通过率:0%
AC君温馨提醒
该题目为【codeforces】题库的题目,您提交的代码将被提交至codeforces进行远程评测,并由ACGO抓取测评结果后进行展示。由于远程测评的测评机由其他平台提供,我们无法保证该服务的稳定性,若提交后无反应,请等待一段时间后再进行重试。
题目描述
John is a lead programmer on a destroyer belonging to the space navy of the Confederacy of Independent Operating Systems. One of his tasks is checking if the electronic brains of robots were damaged during battles.
A standard test is to order the robots to form one or several lines, in each line the robots should stand one after another. After that, each robot reports the number of robots standing in front of it in its line.
An example of robots' arrangement (the front of the lines is on the left). The robots report the numbers above.The i -th robot reported number li . Unfortunately, John does not know which line each robot stands in, and can't check the reported numbers. Please determine if it is possible to form the lines in such a way that all reported numbers are correct, or not.
输入格式
The first line contains a single integer t ( 1≤t≤100 ), denoting the number of test cases.
The first line in each test case contains a single integer n ( 1≤n≤100 ) — the number of robots.
The second line in each test case contains n integers l1,l2,…,ln ( 0≤li<100 ), li is equal to the number of robots in front of the i -th robot in its line.
The sum of n over all test cases won't exceed 200 .
输出格式
For each test case, output "YES", if there exists a robot arrangement consistent with robots' reports. Otherwise, output "NO".
You can output the answer in any case (upper or lower). For example, the strings "yEs", "yes", "Yes", and "YES" will be recognized as positive responses.
输入输出样例
输入#1
5 6 0 1 2 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 3 0 0 2 1 99 5 0 1 2 3 4
输出#1
YES YES NO NO YES
说明/提示
Example arrangement consistent with robot statements from the first example test case:
Example arrangement consistent with robot statements from the second example is shown in the statement.
In the third test case, the third robot claims that there are two machines in front of it. In such a case, the robot directly in front of it would have one machine in front. No robot claims that, so there is no valid arrangement.